New study sheds light on an old problem in
Canada's hospitals and suggests that strategies to shorten wait times should be
considered
By Alan
Katz
and Jennifer Enns EvidenceNetwork.ca
WINNIPEG,
Man./Troy Media/ - Canada's emergency departments are very busy. Every year,
Canadians make about 16 million visits to emergency rooms and more
than one million Canadians are admitted to hospital through emergency
departments.
Given how
complex it is to assess, treat and admit this large and variable population to
hospital, it likely comes as no surprise that nearly all emergency department
patients spend some of their time waiting.
Emergency
department wait times are a matter of concern for Canadians. We wonder if we, or
our loved ones, will have to wait in pain or discomfort for hours before being
seen. Or if a life-threatening condition could get worse while we
wait.
Most of us
have been there: wondering what's taking so long and hoping they'll call our
name next. No one likes waiting, especially for urgent care.
Several
research studies have explored the factors that contribute to wait times. A few
studies have shown that emergency
departments can become overwhelmed by the number of patients arriving
for care. Emergency medicine clinicians and leaders often point to hospital overcrowding as the
main culprit for longer waits because
patients waiting to be admitted occupy stretchers that would
otherwise be available to new patients.
These
observations highlight important opportunities to improve wait times. But one
aspect of emergency care that hasn't been well studied is the time it takes to
assess patients' conditions once they've been seen by a practitioner in the
emergency department.
How long
patient assessment takes depends partly on how sick the patient is. But it can
also be influenced by other factors, such as the need for blood tests, X-rays or
consultation with other health-care specialists.
So how
long do we wait for care?
A recent study led by Dr. Malcolm Doupe at
the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy provides a detailed picture of the many
factors affecting Winnipeg's emergency department wait times - and studies the
patient assessment period for the first time.
The study
team used the relatively new Emergency Department Information System (EDIS) to
track patients as they move through emergency from their initial assessment
(triage) to treatment, and then to hospital admission or discharge.
They found
that Winnipeg emergency departments function moderately well in most instances,
even though they're often at more than 100 per cent capacity during daytime
hours. Across all types of emergency departments, half the patients had a visit
time of 5.1 hours or less, and half stayed longer than 5.1 hours. With a
national wait time average of 4.4 hours, there's clearly plenty of room for
improvement.
It was
better news for urgent care. The study corroborated many
findings from previous
studies and found wait times were very short (median wait time of six
minutes) for those who needed care
immediately. For less urgent conditions, wait times
varied and depended on how
many higher urgency patients were receiving care, and how
many other lower urgency patients were waiting.
But the
study's most striking finding was the importance of the diagnostic testing
process in determining wait times. That's a new piece of evidence that will help
us find solutions.
Diagnostic
tests are an essential part of an emergency doctor's work, but when tests and
scans were ordered, wait times for other patients began to climb significantly.
For example, Winnipeg's emergency departments had periods where up to 45 per
cent of treatment areas were occupied by patients waiting for X-rays or other
tests. During these peak periods, wait times for patients with moderate to less
urgent conditions could increase from 15 minutes to as much as five
hours.
These
findings indicate that new strategies to shorten wait times should be
considered. Could processes within the emergency department be streamlined to
reduce the time it takes to get tests done? Are diagnostic tests quickly
available at all hours and at all emergency departments? Are community-based
providers sending patients to emergency departments to access diagnostic tests
that would best be done in doctors' offices?
Bringing
about improvements to wait times in emergency departments will require
collaboration and new approaches between leaders and experts in emergency
medicine. But there's no reason we can't get there. Patients deserve no
less.
Alan Katz is an expert adviser with EvidenceNetwork.ca and director of the Manitoba Centre for
Health Policy. He is a practising family physician and the Research
Manitoba/Heart and Stroke chair in Primary Prevention Research. Jennifer Enns is
a post-doctoral research fellow at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. She
has expertise in population health, health equity and knowledge
translation.
© 2017 Distributed by Troy
Media
|
Everyday Living® Your information source for products, shopping, marketing and business services, health matters, home and garden, food and lesiure, weight loss, anti-ageing surgical procedures and non-surgical rejuvenation treatments. www.everydayliving.com®
Friday, April 14, 2017
Waiting for emergency care - how long is too long?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
id="blogfeeds"><$BlogFeedsVertical$>
id="postfeeds"><$BlogItemFeedLinks$>